Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
Дата
Msg-id 2182667.1643079012@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Sure.  Do we want to revert in HEAD too?

>> Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and
>> try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas?

> I vote for reverting in release branches only.  I'll propose a better
> WES patch set for master that hopefully also covers async append etc
> (which I was already planning to do before we knew about this Windows
> problem).  More soon.

WFM, but we'll have to remember to revert this in v15 if we don't
have a solid fix by then.

It's kinda late here, so I'll push the reverts tomorrow.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side