Re: A question about leakproof

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: A question about leakproof
Дата
Msg-id 2067840.1665971686@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A question about leakproof  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Ответы 回复:A question about leakproof  ("qiumingcheng" <qiumingcheng@aliyun.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:15:20AM +0800, qiumingcheng wrote:
>> After testing, we don't find the difference between functions of
>> proleakproof=true and functions of proleakproof=false (the function is
>> described in pg_proc).

> Have you looked at
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What%27s_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.2#Security_barriers_and_Leakproof?

Also: the fact that a built-in function is not marked leakproof
doesn't mean that it isn't leakproof.  It could just mean that
we haven't looked at it closely, or that there's too much code
involved to have much confidence that it would stay leakproof.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A question about leakproof
Следующее
От: "qiumingcheng"
Дата:
Сообщение: 回复:A question about leakproof