Re: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum

On 2024-May-09, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:

> With RECREATE TABLE, one day, we would be probably have RECREATE TABLE
> CONCURRENTLY implemented, making pg_repack less needed.

If we really wanted to rename VACUUM FULL, I would go for a name that
betrays its CLUSTER implementation -- maybe CLUSTER UNSORTED or so --
and document it together with regular CLUSTER.  We don't really need a
new top-level command for it IMO.

As for pg_repack, I'd much rather get VACUUM SQUEEZE using pg_squeeze as
an implementation starting point (without the scheduling stuff though.)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/