Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Дата
Msg-id 20240105162847.GB2168314@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 04:18:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Putting that in contrib/ has a lot of extra cost.  One is
> documentation and more complexity regarding versioning when it comes
> to upgrading it to a new version.  I don't think that it is a good
> idea to deal with this extra load of work for something that I'd aim
> to be used for having improved *test* coverage, and the build switch
> should stay.

+1

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Следующее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: verify predefined LWLocks have entries in wait_event_names.txt