Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ZXbaDg5fBl8GLy2u@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:09:45AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I haven't specifically done a review or testing of this patch, but I
> have used this for testing the CLOG group update code with my
> SLRU-specific changes and I found it quite helpful to test some of the
> concurrent areas where you need to stop processing somewhere in the
> middle of the code and testing that area without this kind of
> injection point framework is really difficult or may not be even
> possible. We wanted to test the case of clog group update where we
> can get multiple processes added to a single group and get the xid
> status updated by the group leader, you can refer to my test in that
> thread[1] (the last patch test_group_commit.patch is using this
> framework for testing).
Could you be more specific? test_group_commit.patch includes this
line but there is nothing specific about this injection point getting
used in a test or a callback assigned to it:
./test_group_commit.patch:+ INJECTION_POINT("ClogGroupCommit");
> Overall I feel this framework is quite useful
> and easy to use as well.
Cool, thanks.
--
Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: