Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Тема
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows
Дата
Msg-id
20231205.114342.791823238667404889.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: gai_strerror() is not thread-safe on Windows vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
At Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:26:54 +1300, Thomas Munro  wrote in 
> On second thoughts, I guess it would make more sense to use the exact
> messages Windows' own implementation would return instead of whatever
> we had in the past (probably cribbed from some other OS or just made
> up?).  I asked CI to spit those out[1].  Updated patch attached.  Will
> add to CF.
> 
> [1] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5816802207334400?logs=main#L15

Windows' gai_strerror outputs messages that correspond to the language
environment. Similarly, I think that the messages that the messages
returned by our version should be translatable.

These messages may add extra line-end periods to the parent (or
cotaining) messages when appended. This looks as follows.

(auth.c:517 : errdetail_log() : sub (detail) message)
> Could not translate client host name "hoge" to IP address: An address incompatible with the requested protocol was used..

(hba.c:1562 : errmsg() : main message)
> invalid IP address "192.0.2.1": This is usually a temporary error during hostname resolution and means that the local server did not receive a response from an authoritative server.

When I first saw the first version, I thought it would be better to
use Windows' own messages, just like you did. However, considering the
content of the message above, wouldn't it be better to adhere to
Linux-style messages overall?

A slightly subtler point is that the second example seems to have a
misalignment between the descriptions before and after the colon, but
do you think it's not something to be concerned about to this extent?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
FAQ