Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
От
Nathan Bossart
Тема
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Дата
Msg-id
20231004195059.GA102574@nathanxps13
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
--sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In any case, trying to standardize this looks like it would be a > huge amount of churn for very little gain. I'd recommend making > your markup look similar to what's immediately adjacent, if possible, > and not sweating too much otherwise. I matched the adjacent options as you suggested. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the inclusion of class="parameter" is not the only inconsistency. I also found that pg_upgrade adds the before the argument name! -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления