Re: Using defines for protocol characters

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer  writes:
>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 12:59, Robert Haas  wrote:
>>> PqMsgEmptyQueryResponse or something like that seems better, if we
>>> want to keep the current capitalization. I'm not a huge fan of the way
>>> we vary our capitalization conventions so much all over the code base,
>>> but I think we would at least do well to keep it consistent from one
>>> end of a certain identifier to the other.
> 
>> I don't have a strong preference, but before I make the changes I'd like to
>> get consensus.
>> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
>> acceptable ?
> 
> I'm good with Robert's proposal above.

+1

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com