Re: Using defines for protocol characters
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using defines for protocol characters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230807214714.GA1284531@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using defines for protocol characters (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Re: Using defines for protocol characters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 12:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> PqMsgEmptyQueryResponse or something like that seems better, if we >>> want to keep the current capitalization. I'm not a huge fan of the way >>> we vary our capitalization conventions so much all over the code base, >>> but I think we would at least do well to keep it consistent from one >>> end of a certain identifier to the other. > >> I don't have a strong preference, but before I make the changes I'd like to >> get consensus. >> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is >> acceptable ? > > I'm good with Robert's proposal above. +1 -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: