Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 09:19, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> 3. IMO, the names of the protocol messages in protocol.sgml are >> canonical. Your patch appends "Request" and "Response" in cases where >> that is not part of the actual name. Also, some messages are documented >> to go both ways, so this separation doesn't make sense strictly >> speaking. Please use the names as in protocol.sgml without augmenting >> them.
> I've changed this a number of times. I do not mind changing it again, but > can we reach a consensus ?
I agree with Peter: let's use the names in the protocol document with a single prefix. I've got mixed feelings about whether that prefix should have an underscore, though.