Re: Using defines for protocol characters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Дата
Msg-id 859245.1691438528@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Using defines for protocol characters  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Using defines for protocol characters  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 12:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> PqMsgEmptyQueryResponse or something like that seems better, if we
>> want to keep the current capitalization. I'm not a huge fan of the way
>> we vary our capitalization conventions so much all over the code base,
>> but I think we would at least do well to keep it consistent from one
>> end of a certain identifier to the other.

> I don't have a strong preference, but before I make the changes I'd like to
> get consensus.
> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
> acceptable ?

I'm good with Robert's proposal above.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Configurable FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND