At Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:40:25 +0700, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote in
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:13 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > At Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:09:43 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <
> horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > So, "e.g." (for example) in the message sounds like "that is", which I
> > > think is "i.e.". It should be fixed if this is correct. I'm not sure
> > > whether to keep using Latin-origin acronyms like this, but in the
> > > attached I used "i.e.".
>
> I did my own quick scan and found one use of i.e. that doesn't really fit,
> in a sentence that has other grammatical issues:
>
> - Due to the differences how ECPG works compared to Informix's
> ESQL/C (i.e., which steps
> + Due to differences in how ECPG works compared to Informix's ESQL/C
> (namely, which steps
> are purely grammar transformations and which steps rely on the
Oh!
> I've pushed that in addition to your changes, thanks!
Thanks!
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center