On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> +1 for pg_checkpoint on that -- let's not make it longer than necessary.
>
> And yes, +1 for actually changing it. It's a lot cheaper to change it now
> than it will be in the future. Yes, it would've been even cheaper to have
> already changed it, but we can't go back in time...
Yeah, pg_checkpoint seems like the obvious alternative to pg_checkpointer.
I didn't see a patch in this thread yet, so I've put one together. I did
not include the catversion bump.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com