On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 5:50 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > +1 for pg_checkpoint on that -- let's not make it longer than necessary.
> >
> > And yes, +1 for actually changing it. It's a lot cheaper to change it now
> > than it will be in the future. Yes, it would've been even cheaper to have
> > already changed it, but we can't go back in time...
>
> Yeah, pg_checkpoint seems like the obvious alternative to pg_checkpointer.
> I didn't see a patch in this thread yet, so I've put one together. I did
> not include the catversion bump.
Hearing several votes in favor and none opposed, committed and
back-patched to v15. I added the catversion bump, but left out the .po
file changes, figuring it was better to let those files get updated
via the normal process.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com