BTW I think it's not great to commit with the presented split. We would
have non-trivial short-lived changes for no good reason (0002 in
particular). I think this whole series should be a single patch, with
the commit message being a fusion of messages explaining in full what
the functional change is, listing all the authors together. Having a
commit message like in 0001 where all the distinct changes are explained
in separate sections with each section listing its own author, does not
sound very useful or helpful.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end." (2nd Commandment for C programmers)