Re: 2pc leaks fds
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 2pc leaks fds |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20200508210916.GA23288@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 2pc leaks fds (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 2pc leaks fds
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-May-08, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > I agree to the direction of this patch. Thanks for the explanation. > The patch looks good to me except the two points below. Thanks! I pushed the patch. I fixed the walsender commentary as you suggested, but I'm still of the opinion that we might want to use the XLogReader abstraction in physical walsender than work without it; if nothing else, that would simplify WALRead's API. I didn't change this one though: > wal_segment_close(XlogReaderState *state) is setting > state->seg.ws_file to -1. On the other hand wal_segment_close(state,..) > doesn't update ws_file and the caller sets the returned value to > (eventually) the same field. > > + seg->ws_file = state->routine.segment_open(state, nextSegNo, > + segcxt, &tli); > > If you are willing to do so, I think it is better to make the callback > functions are responsible to update the seg.ws_file and the callers > don't care. I agree that this would be a good idea, but it's more than just a handful of lines of changes so I think we should consider it separately. Attached as 0002. I also realized while doing this that we can further simplify WALRead()'s API if we're willing to bend walsender a little bit more into the fake xlogreader thing; that's 0001. I marked the open item closed nonetheless. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: