On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate,
> given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow
> moving WoA patches to the next CF anyway.
FWIW, I tend to take a base of two weeks as a sensible period of
time as that's half the CF period when I do the classification job.
> Those are the patches that have been set as WoA before this CF, and have
> not been updated since. It's quite possible the state is stale for some
> of those patches, although I've tried to check if there were any
> messages on the list.
You need to be careful about bug fixes, as these are things that we
don't want to lose track of. Another thing that I noticed in the past
is that some patches are registered as bug fixes, but they actually
implement a new feature. So there can be tricky cases.
--
Michael