Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200122142618.iu4ejuaoyhbu2lpy@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:09:39PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate, >> given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow >> moving WoA patches to the next CF anyway. > >FWIW, I tend to take a base of two weeks as a sensible period of >time as that's half the CF period when I do the classification job. > Yeah. I've only nagged about patches that have been set to WoA before the CF began, so far. >> Those are the patches that have been set as WoA before this CF, and have >> not been updated since. It's quite possible the state is stale for some >> of those patches, although I've tried to check if there were any >> messages on the list. > >You need to be careful about bug fixes, as these are things that we >don't want to lose track of. Another thing that I noticed in the past >is that some patches are registered as bug fixes, but they actually >implement a new feature. So there can be tricky cases. >-- Makes sense. -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: