Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

Hi,

On 2019-05-05 18:55:30 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:55 PM Amit Kapila  wrote:
> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:14 PM Amit Kapila  wrote:
> > I am fine going with option (a), that's why I have prepared a revert
> > patch, but I have a slight fear that the other option might not turn
> > out to be better and even if it is then we can anyway replace it as
> > shown in the prototype, so going with option (b) doesn't sound to be
> > dumb.

I don't think we realistically can "anyway replace it as shown in the
prototype" - especially not if we discover we'd need to do so after (or
even close) to 12's release.


> I understand that we have to take a call here shortly, but as there is
> a weekend so I would like to wait for another day to see if anyone
> else wants to share his opinion.

I still think that's the right course. I've previously stated that, so
I'm probably not fulfilling the "anyone else" criterion though.

Greetings,

Andres Freund