Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+Sn7PnW4U0Xc9aK6o4xRgFfQP9-vXuWeMGz-MEXQ5tSw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2019-05-05 18:55:30 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> I understand that we have to take a call here shortly, but as there is
> >> a weekend so I would like to wait for another day to see if anyone
> >> else wants to share his opinion.
>
> > I still think that's the right course. I've previously stated that, so
> > I'm probably not fulfilling the "anyone else" criterion though.
>
> I also prefer "revert and try again in v13", but I'm not "anyone else"
> either ...
>

Fine, I will take care of that today.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Broken O(n^2) avoidance in wal segment recycling.
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins