Re: clean up pg_checksums.sgml

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:51:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 09:32:10AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > PFA patch with minor improvements to documentation.
> 
> Patch does not apply, and I have reworded the last paragraph about
> failures while operating.

Sorry, the patch was on top of an brief effort I made to rename "check
checksums" to "verify checksums", before asking about the idea.

PFA patch to master.

Justin

> > Also, what do you think about changing user-facing language from
> > "check checksum" to "verify checksum" ?  I see that commit ed308d78
> > actually moved in the other direction, but I preferred "verify".
> 
> Yes, that's a debate that we had during the discussion for the new
> switches, and we have decided to use --check over --verify for the
> default option.  On the one hand, "Check checksums" is rather
> redundant, but that's more consistent with the option name.  "Verify
> checksums" is perhaps more elegant.  My opinion is that having some
> consistency between the option names and the docs is nicer.