Hi,
On 2018-11-26 12:30:06 +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Hmm... I considered SIGHUP processing was in fast loop and therefore shutdown should be fast. But i recheck code and
founda possible long loop without processing SIGHUP (in case we receive new data faster than writes to disk). Ok, i
willrevert back.
> How about write to WalRcvData only clobbered conninfo?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean? The way I'd solve this is that
that only walreceiver, at startup, writes out its conninfo/slot_name,
sourcing the values from the GUCs. That way there's no issue with values
being overwritten early.
- Andres