Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on masterbranch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on masterbranch
Дата
Msg-id 20180413033645.kur4u5y6sccbxnpi@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on masterbranch  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-04-13 12:29:21 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/04/13 7:36, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> >> In short, it looks like the tests added to update.sql by commit
> >> 2f178441 ("Allow UPDATE to move rows between partitions") lead to this
> >> failure, since I always hit a problem when update.sql is reached. I
> >> haven't gone to the trouble of digging any deeper than that just yet.
> > 
> > Without having looked at it in much detail, this seems rather more
> > likely to be the fault of 2f178441. That was recent enough that it's
> > easy to believe that I'd be the first to notice it, and actually has
> > on-disk changes, in the form of ItemPointerSetMovedPartitions().
> 
> I think you meant f16241bef7cc2 (Raise error when affecting tuple moved
> into different partition), because it's the one that adds
> ItemPointerSetMovedPartitions.  Commit 2f178441 you quoted added the test
> that triggered the failure.

Right. Amul, have you looked at this?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Следующее
От: amul sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch