Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180301083404.z2sbnjdaw7gxvz6x@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts ("Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-01-28 23:02:57 +0000, Rady, Doug wrote: > diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c > index 31ea6ca06e..689f15a772 100644 > --- a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c > +++ b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c > @@ -44,7 +44,13 @@ > #include <signal.h> > #include <time.h> > #include <sys/time.h> > -#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H > +#ifdef PGBENCH_USE_SELECT /* force use of select(2)? */ > +#undef HAVE_PPOLL > +#endif > +#ifdef HAVE_PPOLL > +#include <poll.h> > +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H) > +#define POLL_USING_SELECT (random thing noticed while going through patches) It strikes me as a bad idea to undefine configure selected symbols. Postgres header might rely on them. It also strikes me as entirely unnecessary here. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: