Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1803011121300.7903@lancre
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>> -#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H
>> +#ifdef PGBENCH_USE_SELECT            /* force use of select(2)? */
>> +#undef HAVE_PPOLL
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef HAVE_PPOLL
>> +#include <poll.h>
>> +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H)
>> +#define POLL_USING_SELECT
>
> (random thing noticed while going through patches)
>
> It strikes me as a bad idea to undefine configure selected
> symbols. Postgres header might rely on them. It also strikes me as
> entirely unnecessary here.

Yes, I though about this one but let it pass. Indeed, it would be 
sufficient to not load "poll.h" when select is forced, without undefining 
the configure setting.

-- 
Fabien.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Следующее
От: Jeevan Chalke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping