On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:30:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "'Bruce Momjian'" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We don't normally release-note documentation changes. If this
> >> wasn't purely a documentation change, then I was probably in error
> >> to decide it didn't need to be in the notes.
>
> > It was purely a documentation change, but it was a documented change in a
> > long-standing and popular practice of not using too many shared buffers
> > on Windows, so I thought it wise to add it.
>
> Well, if the intent of the note was to encourage people to raise
> shared_buffers, it didn't do a very good job of that as written,
> because I sure didn't understand it that way.
Do you have any suggestions since it is not a code change that I can
point to? My guess is that the limitation was removed years ago, but we
only found out recently.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers