Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Дата
Msg-id 20150728170001.GC4726@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2015-07-28 18:59:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Attached are:
>
> a) a slightly evolved version of Michael's patch disabling renegotiation
>    by default that I'm planning to apply to 9.4 - 9.0
>
> b) a patch removing renegotiation entirely from master and 9.5
>
> Unless somebody protests soon I'm going to push something like that
> after having dinner.
>
> I am wondering whether b) ought to remove Port->count, but I'm currently
> leaning to leaving it in place for now; perhaps adding a comment in the
> struct.  I'm actually thinking we very well might want to add something
> like it to all backends, but more importantly it'd make the diff larger
> with mostly unrelated changes.

And really attached.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions