Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:41:44AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Uh, I think you mean "number" here:
> > 
> >          <entry>Time stamp without milliseconds (as a numer)</entry>
> >                                                       -----
> 
> Oh, right, that's a stupid typo.
> 
> > 
> > Also, what "number" do you mean?  Unix time since 1970?
> 
> Yes, the usual unix timestamp.

I think you need to find out where we reference that and use the same
wording.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +