Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Дата
Msg-id 20150322015551.GD3636@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:41:44AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > Uh, I think you mean "number" here:
> > > 
> > >          <entry>Time stamp without milliseconds (as a numer)</entry>
> > >                                                       -----
> > 
> > Oh, right, that's a stupid typo.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also, what "number" do you mean?  Unix time since 1970?
> > 
> > Yes, the usual unix timestamp.
> 
> I think you need to find out where we reference that and use the same
> wording.

We use "Unix epoch" in various places.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL 9.4 mmap(2) performance regression on FreeBSD...