On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:28:21AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No, I think you're missing the point of what I'm saying, and I think
> the addition is at best misleading. I would avoid talk of key value
> pairs, anyway, that's not all that's in a json document (it might be
> an array, for example).
>
> How about:
>
> This data type allows for faster access to values in the json document and faster and more useful indexing of
json.
OK, I used you wording. You are right I didn't understand it.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +