Re: logical changeset generation v6

On 2014-04-24 09:39:21 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus, but
> I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we
> couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was the
> best?

I went with pg_recvlogical because that's where the (small) majority
seemed to be. Even if I was unconvinced. There were so many outstanding
big fights at that point that I didn't want to spend my time on this ;)

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services