On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have: > * pg_receivexlog > * pg_recvlogical > binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and > once "pg_receive"?
+1
Digging up a really old thread since I just got annoyed by the inconsistent naming the first time myself :)
I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus, but I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was the best?
I definitely think pg_receivelogical would be a better name, for consistency (because it's way too late to rename pg_receivexlog of course - once released that can't really chance. Which is why *if* we want to change the name of pg_recvxlog we have a few more days to make a decision..)