On 2014-04-04 21:42:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > The new master won't necessarily have all the neccessary WAL available, no?
> No, they won't have it, and things begin to get bad once a base backup
> includes a slot that has a non-null value of restart_lsn.
In other words, every slot that has been used.
> I imagine
> that if we want to guarantee the correctness of a replication slot we
> would need to fetch from archives the necessary WAL files needed for
> it when a node is in recovery, which is not something that this patch
> does...
Does that mean you "retract" the patch?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services