Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Дата
Msg-id 20131206133808.GE8935@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2013-12-06 22:35:21 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> >No.  They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned.
> >Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think
> >any change in the code behavior would be an improvement.
> 
> You are suggesting that we should add a note like "Don't worry about the
> following message.  This is a result of normal connectivity checking", don't
> you?
> 
> FATAL:  the database system is starting up

Uh. An explanation why you cannot connect to the database hardly seems
like a superflous log message.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Следующее
От: "Dr. Andreas Kunert"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature request: Logging SSL connections