Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Дата
Msg-id 20131204.162819.1459835641271977076.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO  (KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo.mitsumasa@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Список pgsql-hackers
>> Can we avoid the Linux kernel problem by simply increasing our shared
>> buffer size, say up to 80% of memory?
> It will be swap more easier.

Is that the case? If the system has not enough memory, the kernel
buffer will be used for other purpose, and the kernel cache will not
work very well anyway. In my understanding, the problem is, even if
there's enough memory, the kernel's cache does not work as expected.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shigeru Hanada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Следующее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO