On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:41:17PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> These changes are coupled because measures are changed, and their
> reporting as well. Submitting separate patches for these different
> features would result in conflicting or dependent patches, so I
> wish to avoid that if possible.
My feelings on the patch split haven't changed; your three bullet points call
for four separate patches. Conflicting patches are bad, but dependent patches
are okay; just disclose the dependency order. How about this: as a next step,
please extract just this feature that I listed last Saturday:
Patch (4): Redefine "latency" as reported by pgbench and report "lag" more.
Once that's committed, we can move on to others.
nm
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com