Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 v2 - A

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 v2 - A
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.02.1309262046020.5704@sto
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 v2  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 v2 - A  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>  Patch (4): Redefine "latency" as reported by pgbench and report "lag" more.

Here is a first partial patch, which focusses on measuring latency and 
reporting the measure under --progress.

**

Improve pgbench measurements & progress report

Measure transaction latency instead under --rate and --progress.

The previous computed figure does not make sense under throttling:
as sleep throttling time was included in the figures, the displayed
results were plain false.

The latency and its standard deviation are printed out under progress and 
in the final report when available.

It could be made "always" available, but that would require to accept 
additional gettimeofday calls. I do not think that there is a performance 
issue here, but there is significant opposition to the idea.

Sample output under benchmarking with --progress=1
  progress: 1.0 s, 2626.1 tps, 0.374 stddev 0.597 ms lat  progress: 2.0 s, 2766.6 tps, 0.358 stddev 0.588 ms lat
progress:3.0 s, 2567.4 tps, 0.385 stddev 0.665 ms lat  progress: 4.0 s, 3014.2 tps, 0.328 stddev 0.593 ms lat
progress:5.0 s, 2959.3 tps, 0.334 stddev 0.553 ms lat  ...  progress: 16.0 s, 5009.2 tps, 0.197 stddev 0.381 ms lat
... progress: 24.0 s, 7051.2 tps, 0.139 stddev 0.284 ms lat  ...  progress: 50.0 s, 6860.5 tps, 0.143 stddev 0.052 ms
lat ...
 

The "warmup" is quite fast because the DB is on a SSD. In the beginning
the standard deviation is well over the average transaction time, but
when the steady state is reached (later) it is much below.

-- 
Fabien.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Singer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical changeset generation v6
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minmax indexes