Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 v2

> My feelings on the patch split haven't changed; your three bullet points call
> for four separate patches.  Conflicting patches are bad, but dependent patches
> are okay;

Indeed, this is the only solution if you do not want one patch. Note that 
it will not possible to backtrack one of the patch but the last one 
without conflicts.

> just disclose the dependency order.  How about this: as a next step, 
> please extract just this feature that I listed last Saturday:
>
>  Patch (4): Redefine "latency" as reported by pgbench and report "lag" more.
>
> Once that's committed, we can move on to others.

Ok, I'll submit a first part, hopefully today, possibly the one you 
suggest, about fixing and extending latency measure under --rate and 
reporting it under progress.

-- 
Fabien.