On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:26:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Shouldn't this commit have removed the 1.0 file from git altogether?
> >> It's quite useless if it's not going to get installed.
>
> > I left it for the possible documentation value thereof.
>
> We do not keep around dead code in HEAD for historical reference
> purposes. We have an SCM for that, and we should use it. The only
> reason to keep this file would be if people were possibly still going to
> install 1.0 in preference to 1.1 ... but this commit eliminated the
> possibility of users doing so.
Would someone please do the above --- I am unclear exactly what files
need to be removed, and any Makefile adjustments.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +