Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Дата
Msg-id 20120814192453.GC11913@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug  4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> > 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
> > > 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
> > >> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
> > > I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
> > 
> > I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> > so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> > converted so the whole source tree is consistent.
> 
> I would be in favor of that.

I have implemented this with the patch at:
http://momjian.us/expire/true_diff.txt

I did not modify the Win32 code which traditionally uses uppercase for
TRUE/FALSE.

It would be applied only to HEAD.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGFPE handler is naive