Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
> > 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
> >> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
> > I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
> 
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

I would be in favor of that.