Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Thu, Aug  4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
>>> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
>>> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

>> I would be in favor of that.

> I have implemented this with the patch at:
>     http://momjian.us/expire/true_diff.txt

Does this really do anything for us that will justify the extra
back-patching pain it will cause?  I don't see that it's improving
code readability any.
        regards, tom lane