Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 08:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> You probably wouldn't do either of those things. You'd just allocate
> >> small chunks here and there for whatever you need them for.
> >
> > Well, then we do that with shared memory then --- my point is that it is
> > the same problem with threads or processes.
>
> That's what my patch allows you to do, yes. Currently you are bound to
> pre-allocate shared memory at startup. Or how would you allocate small
> chunks from shared memory at the moment?
We don't --- we allocate it all at startup.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +