On 08/09/2010 08:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Markus Wanner wrote:
>> That's what my patch allows you to do, yes. Currently you are bound to
>> pre-allocate shared memory at startup. Or how would you allocate small
>> chunks from shared memory at the moment?
>
> We don't --- we allocate it all at startup.
Exactly. And that's the difference to a thread-based approach. The
downside of it is that you need to know in advance how much shared
memory each of the subsystems is going to need. On the upside is the
certainty, that you already have the memory allocated and cannot run out
of it. You just have what you have.
(Note that you could do that as well with the thread-based approach, if
you want. Most other programs I know don't choose that approach, though,
but instead try to cope with OOM).
Regards
Markus