Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Дата
Msg-id 201001292045.o0TKjsQ12561@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > With the release of Postgres 9.0, should we consider changing the
> > default for 'standard_conforming_strings'?
> 
> I'm inclined to think we're going to have enough problems without that.
> Changing that default will break, approximately speaking, every single
> Postgres client app.  Do you really think more than epsilon of them
> are clean and ready for such a change?

Well, if they aren't ready now, then we might as well say we are never
going to change it and update the documentation and TODO list to reflect
that --- we have had standard_conforming_strings since 2005.  We can't
keep pretending this will happen if we have no intention of doing it.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Следующее
От: Alex Hunsaker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings