Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Hunsaker
Тема Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Дата
Msg-id 34d269d41001291250p3f8514eeg2e3af27c3c0daa65@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> With the release of Postgres 9.0, should we consider changing the
>>> default for 'standard_conforming_strings'?
>
>> I'm inclined to think we're going to have enough problems without that.

> [ still bearing scars from the 8.3 implicit-cast business, which we
> didn't think would generate nearly the backlash it did... ]

Yeah that was my first reaction.  But then again we also have a guc
they can change back.  Sure you could create your own typecasts to
restore the old behavior in 8.3 (after trolling the mailing lists, or
finding some blog entry that got created X months after the
release...).   Thats no where near as nice as a simple setting.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings