Fujii Masao escribió:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Dickson S. Guedes escribió:
> >> Fujii Masao escreveu:
> >>> (...)
> >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another
> >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name
> >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication').
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think.
> >>> Any other ideas?
> >>
> >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other
> >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too.
> >
> > Hmm, what is this database there for?
>
> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before.
> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php
Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make
much sense, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support