On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao escribió:
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> > Dickson S. Guedes escribió:
>> >> Fujii Masao escreveu:
>> >>> (...)
>> >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another
>> >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name
>> >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication').
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think.
>> >>> Any other ideas?
>> >>
>> >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other
>> >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too.
>> >
>> > Hmm, what is this database there for?
>>
>> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before.
>> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php
>
> Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make
> much sense, right?
Oh, I'm sorry!
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center