Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fujii Masao escribió:
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>> Dickson S. Guedes escribió:
>>>> Fujii Masao escreveu:
>>>>> (...)
>>>>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another
>>>>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name
>>>>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication').
>>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think.
>>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other
>>>> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too.
>>> Hmm, what is this database there for?
>> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before.
>> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php
>
> Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make
> much sense, right?
Right.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com