Re: Not ready for 8.3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: Not ready for 8.3
Дата
Msg-id 20070516.101643.94564776.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Not ready for 8.3  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: Not ready for 8.3  ("Nathan Buchanan" <nbinont@gmail.com>)
Re: Not ready for 8.3  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Not ready for 8.3  (tomas@tuxteam.de)
Re: Not ready for 8.3  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >> They are not stable.  The items should point to the archives, which are
> >> supposedly more stable.  (I had already fixed one item in PatchStatus
> >> this morning).  Really it would be much nicer to have links using the
> >> Message-Id but I doubt that's at all doable.
> > 
> > hrm - I see so is there a particular reason for that behaviour ?
> 
> They're stable until Bruce removes something from the queue. When
> something is removed, it's renumbered.
> 
> It's how mhonarc works. It's the same with the archives - if we delete a
> mail, they get renumbered. So we never should delete, we should just
> blank out, but it has happened a couple of times.

As I proposed for many times, why don't we add message number to each
subject line in mail? For example like this:

[HACKERS: 12345] Re: Not ready for 8.3

This way, we could always obtain stable (logical) pointer, without
reling on particular archival infrastructure.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee