Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
> > > > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
> > > > many dirty wal buffers accumulate.
> > >
> > > Yes
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
> >
> > I have seen no patch yet with the agreed changes.
>
> True, will be at least a few more days yet.
>
> I've got a few questions I'll post later today.
Again, I have seen no follup patch for this. I would keep it for 8.4
but I am unsure what the issue even is, so I am deleting this message.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +